Person fiction Adanced



used to be

The key to defining your legal character is the word “person”. Regulations created by government agencies and statutes and/or ordinances passed by elected legislators are all written for legal “persons”. Therefore it is crucial that we understand what a “person” is . . . and what it is not. Here are legal definitions:

Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations (44 U.S.C. Chapter 15 § 1501.Definitions
”person” means an individual, partnership, association, or corporation (4 artificially created legal entities – not one a living being!)

California statutes:
Government code Section 1-26
17. “Person” includes any person, firm, association, organization, partnership, limited liability company, business trust, corporation, or company (9 artificially created legal entities – not one a living being!)

Ohio statutes:
Statutory definitions 1.59
(C) “Person” includes an individual, corporation, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, and association (7 artificially created legal entities – not one a living being!)

Uniform Commercial Code Article 1 – General Provisions
Sec 1-201 General Definitions
(27) “Person” means an individual, corporation, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, limited liability company, association, joint venture, government, governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality, public corporation, or any other legal or commercial entity. (14 artificially created legally created entities – not one a living being!)

Legal “persons” are not flesh and blood living men and women.

Proof that our laws/statutes are written for legal fiction “persons” and corporations – not for flesh and blood living men and women – can also be found in the legal process by which courts interpret and apply statutory legislation. Sometimes statutes have straightforward meanings, but in many cases, there is some ambiguity or vagueness in the verbiage that must be resolved by a judge. To interpret applicability, judges use various tools and methods, including traditional canons. The judiciary may apply rules of interpretation both to legislation enacted by the legislature and to delegated-legislation such as administrative agency regulations.


Here are three prominent rules considered by judges when they interpret the applicability of statutes/rules:

1) ejusdem generis – rules only apply to persons or things of the same kind or class.
Of the same kind, class, or nature. In statutory construction, the “ejusdem generis rule” is that where general words follow an enumeration of persons or things, by words of a particular and specific meaning, such general words are not to be construed in their widest extent, but are to be held as applying only to persons or things of the same general kind or class as those specifically mentioned.


2) expressio unius est exclusio alterius – one thing having been mentioned, the other is excluded
Is a rule of construction, applying both to statute and legal writings, that states that one thing having been mentioned the other is excluded. Thus, following this rule, ‘no dogs allowed’ means that lions are allowed but guide dogs are excluded.


3) noscitur a sociis – meaning understood from accompanying words
Means comprehended from accompanying words, perceived from accompanying words, realized from accompanying words, recognized from accompanying words, understood from accompanying words

If any or all of these rules are applied to federal regulations, state statutes and the Uniform Commercial Code, it becomes even more apparent that they are not written for living men and women. Corporations are chartered, regulated and taxed by the State, therefore they must use the same legal definition for their customers.

In America the states have authority over relevant matters in their respective jurisdictions, unless the state’s definitions of their statutes conflicts with those recognized federally. This explains why both California and Ohio define “persons” almost identically with the Federal Register and the Uniform Commercial Code.

While the term “character” includes both men and persons, the
way the term “person” is used in statutes – preceding a list of non-living
legal entities – precludes it from referring to living men and women . . . unless the Uniform Commercial Code rule regarding “presumption” is applied! It is presumed that you and I have agreed to represent the non-living legal-fiction “person”, unless we rebut that presumption.

§ 1-206. Presumptions.
Whenever the Uniform Commercial Code creates a “presumption” with respect to a fact, or provides that a fact is “presumed,” the trier of fact must find the existence of the fact unless and until evidence is introduced that supports a finding of its nonexistence.


The difference between legal “persons” and men (or women) is as significant as the difference between life and death and they are expressed differently. JOHN DOE and JANE DOE are “persons”, John Doe is a man and Jane Doe is a woman!

legal “persons” can’t walk
legal “persons” can’t talk
legal “persons” have no gender

Section 1-106. Use of Singular and Plural; Gender.
In the Uniform Commercial Code, unless the statutory context otherwise requires: (1) words in the singular number include the plural, and those in the plural include the singular; and (2) words of any gender also refer to any other gender.

In legal-land, “persons” aren’t real – they are artificially created legal entities/corporations!


used to be

How to be dealing with the Strawman?


Now after finding out all this about the name fraud you'll probably feel angry. I urge you to get over this quick and find ways to get back into power. Yes it's a shady game that's being played on all of us, and yes we're talking about fraud.  We've never got properly schooled on this and yes that's intentional. Now they do say you are required to know the law.  So let's get to know it then from now on!   There are strategies that can give you back some power. is looking for information about this and will publish it.  How ever your actions are your own responsibility. Please properly research before trying any strategy!  You could get yourself in trouble by moving too fast.  A good way to start is by watching the solution based series video's on Observation Deck.  





If you are interested in our services please read the following information so that you will understand the process you are initiatingon your behalf  by subscribing to services provided by WWW.CREDITDEBTELIMINATION.WEBS.COM or WWW.TAXSMASHERS.WEBS.COM

Warning: This is a complicated process please leave the process to professionals!

 In order for you to grasp an understanding of how to use the Accepted for Value" process and the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and the remedy given to us to "discharge debt" we have to study The History of How We Were Put Into the “Commerce Game”

The History of How We Were Put Into the “Commerce Game”

On April 5, 1933, then President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, under Executive Order, issued April 5, 1933, declared: "All persons are required to deliver on or before May 1, 1933 all Gold Coin, Gold Bullion, and Gold Certificates now owned by them to a Federal Reserve Bank, panch or agency, or to any member bank of the Federal Reserve System."

James A. Farley, Postmaster General at that time, required each postmaster in the country to post a copy of the Executive Order in a conspicuous place within each panch of the Post Office. On the bottom of the posting was the following:

Criminal Penalties For Violation Of Executive Order

$10,000 fine or 10 years imprisonment, or both, as provided in Section 9 of the order.

Section 9 of the order reads as follows:

 "Whosoever willfully violates any provisions of this Executive Order or of these regulations or of any rule, regulation or license issued thereunder may be fined not more than $10,000, or if a natural person, may be imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both; and any officer, director or agency of any corporation who knowingly participates in any such violation may be punished by a like fine, imprisonment, or both."

NOTE: Stated within a written document received September 17, 1997, from the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel, Office of the Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Richard L. Shiffin, in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), was the following: "A fact that is frequently overlooked is that Executive Orders and proclamations of the President normally have no direct effect upon private persons or their property, and instead, normally constitute only directives or instructions to officers or employees of the Federal Government. The exception is those cases in which the President is expressly authorized or required by laws enacted by the Congress to issue an Executive order or proclamation dealing with the legal rights or obligations of members of the public. Such as issuance of Selective Service Regulations, establishment of boards to investigate certain labor disputes, and establishment of quotas or fees with respect to certain imports into this country."

Note: it seems rather obvious that President Franklin D. Roosevelt was not "expressly authorized or required" to "issue an Executive Order or proclamation" demanding the public (private) to relinquish their privately held gold.

The order (proclamation) issued by Roosevelt was an undisciplined act of treason. Two months after the Executive Order, on June 5, 1933, the Senate and House of Representatives, 73d Congress, 1st session, at 4:30 P.M. approve House Joint Resolution 192 (HJR-192) 192: Joint Resolution to suspend the Gold Standard and apogate the Gold Clause, Joint resolution to assure uniform value to the coins and currencies of the United States.

HJR-192 states, in part, that:

"Every provision contained in or made with respect to any obligation which purports to give the oblige a right to require payment in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency, or in any amount of money of the United States measured thereby, is declared to be against public policy, and no such provision shall be contained in or made with respect to any obligation hereafter incurred. Every obligation, heretofore or hereafter incurred, whether or not any such provisions is contained therein or made with respect thereto, shall be discharged upon payment, dollar for dollar, in any such coin or currency which at the time of payment is legal tender for public and private debts."

HJR-192 goes on to state:

"As used in this resolution, the term 'obligation' means an obligation (including every obligation of and to the United States, excepting currency) payable in money of the United States; and the term 'coin or currency' means coin or currency of the United States, including Federal Reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal Reserve banks and national banking associations."

HJR-192 superseded Public Law (what passes as law today is only "color of law"), replacing it with public policy. This eliminated our ability to PAY our debts, allowing only for their DISCHARGE. When we use any commercial paper (checks, drafts, warrants, federal reserve notes, etc.), and accept it as money, we simply pass the unpaid debt attached to the paper on to others, by way of our purchases and transactions. This unpaid debt, under public policy, now carries a public liability for its collection. In other words, all debt is now public.

The United States government, in order to provide necessary goods and services, created a commercial bond (promissory note), by pledging the property, labor, life and body of its citizens, as payment for the debt (bankruptcy). This commercial bond made chattel (property) out of every man, woman and child in the United States. We became nothing more than "human resources" and collateral for the debt. This was without our knowledge and/or our consent. How? It was done through the filing (registration) of our birth certificates!

The United States government -actually the elected and appointed administrators of government -took (and still do, to this day) certified copies of all our birth certificates and placed them in the United States Department of Commerce ... as registered securities. These securities, each of which carries an estimated $1,000,000 (one million) dollar value, have been (and still are) circulated around the world as collateral for loans, entries on the asset side of ledgers, etc., just like any other security. There's just one problem, we didn't authorize it.

The United States is a District of Columbia corporation. In Volume 20: Corpus Juris Sec. § 1785 we find "The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a State" (see: NY re: Merriam 36 N.E. 505 1441 S. 0.1973, 14 L. Ed. 287). Since a corporation is a fictitious "person" (it can not speak, see, touch, smell, etc.), it can not, by itself, function in the real world. It needs a conduit, a transmitting utility, a liaison of some sort, to "connect" the fictional person, and fictional world in which it exists, to the real world.

LIVING people, exist in a real world, not a fictional, virtual world. But government does exist in a fictional world, and can only deal directly with other fictional or virtual persons, agencies, states, etc. In order for a fictional person to deal with real people there must be a connection, a liaison, and a go-between. This can be something as simple as a contract. When both "persons," the real and the fictional, agree to the terms of a contract, there is a connection, intercourse, dealings, there is a communication, an exchange. There is business! But there is another way for fictional government to deal with the real man and woman: through the use of a representative, a liaison, and the go-between. Who is this go-between, this liaison that connects fictional government to real men and women? It's a government created shadow, a fictional man or woman ... with the same name as ours.

This PERSON was created by using our birth certificates as the Manufacturer's Certificate of Origin (MCO) and the state in which we were born as the "port of entry". This gave fictional government a fictional PERSON with whom to deal directly. This PERSON is a STRAWMAN

STRAMINEUS HOMO: Latin: A man of straw, one of no substance, put forward as bail or surety. This definition comes from Black's Law Dictionary, 6th. Edition, page 1421. Following the definition of STRAMINEUS HOMO in Black's we find the next word, STRAWMAN STRAWMAN: A front, a third party who is put up in name only to take part in a transaction. Nominal party to a transaction; one who acts as an agent for another for the purposes of taking title to real property and executing whatever documents and instruments the principal may direct. Person who purchases property for another to conceal identity of real purchaser or to accomplish some purpose otherwise not allowed. Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary defines the term "STRAWMAN" as:


1: a weak or imaginary opposition set up only to be easily confuted

2: a person set up to serve as a cover for a usually questionable transaction.


The STRAWMAN can be summed up as an imaginary, passive stand-in for the real participant; a front; a blind; a person regarded as a nonentity. The STRAWMAN is a "shadow", a go-between. For quite some time a rather large number of people in this country have known that a man or woman's name, written in ALL CAPS, or last name first, does not identify real, living people. Taking this one step further, the rules of grammar for the English language have no provisions for the abpeviation of people's names, i.e. initials are not to be used. As an example, John Adam Smith is correct. ANYTHING else is not correct. Not Smith, John Adam or Smith, John A. or J. Smith or J. A. Smith or JOHN ADAM SMITH or SMITH, JOHN or any other variation. NOTHING, other than John Adam Smith identifies the real, living man. All other appellations identify either a deceased man or a fictitious man: such as a corporation or a STRAWMAN

Over the years government, through its "public" school system, has managed to pull the wool over our eyes and keep US ignorant of some very important facts. Because all facets of the media (print, radio, television) have an ever-increasing influence in our lives, and because media is controlled (with the issuance of licenses, etc.) by government and its agencies, we have slowly and systematically been led to believe that any form/appellation of our names is, in fact, still us: as long as the spelling is correct. WRONG!

We Were Never Told

We were never told, with full and open disclosure, what our government officials were planning to do and why. We were never told that government (the United States) was a corporation, a fictitious "person". We were never told that government had quietly, almost secretly, created a shadow, a STRAWMAN for each and every AMERICAN, so that government could not only "control" the people, but also raise an almost unlimited amount of revenue - so it could continue not just to exist, but to GROW. We were never told that when government deals with the STRAWMAN it is not dealing with real, living, men and women. We were never told, openly and clearly with full disclosure of all the facts, that since June 5, 1933, we have been unable to pay our debts. We were never told that we had been pledged (and our children, and their children, and their children, and on and on) as collateral, mere chattel, for the debt created by government officials who committed treason in doing so. We were never told that they quietly and cleverly changed the rules, even the game itself, and that the world we perceive as real is in fact fictional -and it's all for their benefit. We were never told that the STRAWMAN -a fictional person, a creature of the state -is subject to all the codes, statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances, etc. decreed by government, but that WE, the real man and woman, are not. We were never told we were being treated as property, as slaves (albeit comfortably for some); while living in the land of the free -and that we could, easily, walk away from the fraud.

There's something else you should know:

Everything, since June 1933, operates in COMMERCE! Commerce is based on agreement, contract. Government has an implied agreement with the STRAWMAN (government's creation) and the STRAWMAN is subject to government rule, as we illustrated above. But when we, the real flesh and blood man and woman, step into their "process" we become the "surety" for the fictional STRAWMAN Reality and fiction are reversed. We then become liable for the debts, liabilities and obligations of the STRAWMAN, relinquishing our real (protected) character as we stand up for the fictional STRAWMAN

So that we can once again place the STRAWMAN in the fictional world and ourselves in the real world (with all our "shields" in place against fictional government) we must send a nonnegotiable (private) "Charge Back" and a nonnegotiable "Bill of Exchange" to the United States Secretary of Treasury, along with a copy of our birth certificate, the evidence, the MCO, of the STRAWMAN By doing this we discharge our portion of the public debt, releasing US, the real man, from the debts, liabilities and obligations of the STRAWMAN Those debts, liabilities and obligations exist in the fictional commercial world of "book entries", on computers and/or in paper ledgers. It is a world of "digits" and "notes", not of money and substance. Property of the real man once again becomes tax exempt and free from levy, as it must be in accord with HJR-192.

Sending the nonnegotiable Charge Back and Bill of Exchange accesses our Treasury Direct Account (TDA). What is our Treasury Direct Account? According to one theorist, it is a pledge that was made for each birth certificate in the amount of $630,000 (another pegs it at $1,000,000). Thus everybody and everything in the United States is simply collateral for the bonds issued by the U.S. government.

This $1,000,000 (one million) account is for the STRAWMAN, the fictional "person" with the name in all caps and/or last name first. It is there for the purpose of making book entries, to move figures, "digits" from one side of ledgers to the other. Without constant movement a shark will die and quite ironically, like the shark, there must also be constant movement in commerce, or it too will die. Figures, digits, the entries in ledgers must move from asset side to debit side and back again, or commerce dies. No movement, no commerce.

The fictional person of government can only function in a fictional commercial world, one where there is no real money, only fictional funds ... mere entries, figures, and digits.

A presentment from fictional government -from traffic citation to criminal charges -is a negative, commercial "claim" against the STRAWMAN This "claim" takes place in the commercial, fictional world of government. "Digits" move from one side of your STRAWMAN account to the other, or to a different account. This is today's commerce.

"Playing The Commerce Game"

What if we learned how to control the flow and movement of entries, figures, and digits, for our own benefit? Is that possible? How can the real man in the real world, function in the fictional world in which the commerce game exists?

When in commerce do as commerce does, use the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)? The UCC-1 Financing Statement is the one contract in the world that can NOT be poken and it's the foundation of the Accepted for Value process. The power of this document is awesome.

Since the Treasury Direct Account (TDA) exists for the STRAWMAN - who, until now, has been controlled by government - We can gain control (and ownership) of the STRAWMAN by first activating the TDA and then filing an UCC-1 Financing Statement. This does two things for US.

First, by activating the TDA we gain limited control over the funds in the account. This allows us to also move entries, figures, and digits ... for OUR benefit.

Secondly, by properly filing an UCC-1 Financing Statement we can become the holder in due course of the STRAWMAN This gives us virtual ownership of the government created entity.

Remember earlier we mentioned that a presentment from government or one of its agents or agencies was a negative commercial claim against the STRAWMAN (and the STRAWMAN's account, the TDA)? Remember we told you entries, figures, and digits moved from one side of the account to the other, or to a different account? Well now, with the STRAWMAN under our control, government has no access to the TDA and they also lose their go-between, their liaison, their "connection" to the real, living man and woman. From now on, when presented with a "claim" (presentment) from government, we will agree with it (this removes the "controversy") and we will ACCEPT IT FOR VALUE. By doing this we remove the negative claim against our account and become the "holder in due course" of the presentment. As holder in due course you can require the sworn testimony of the presenter of the "claim" (under penalty of perjury) and request the account be properly adjusted.

It's a commercial undertaking, and the basic procedure is not complicated. In fact, it's fairly simple. We just have to remember a few things, like: this is commerce, and we play by the rules of commerce. We accept the "claim", become the holder in due course, and challenge whether or not the presenter of the claim had/has the proper authority (the Order) to make the claim (debit our account) in the first place. When they cannot produce the Order (they never can, it was never issued) we request the account be properly adjusted and the charge, the "claim” is discharged and goes away.

If they don't adjust the account a request is made for the bookkeeping records showing where the funds in question were assigned. This is done by requesting the Fiduciary Tax Estimate and the Fiduciary Tax Return for this claim. Since the claim has been accepted for value and is prepaid, and our TDA account is exempt from levy, the request for the Fiduciary Tax Estimate and the Fiduciary Tax Return is valid because the information is necessary in determining who is delinquent and/or making claims on the account. If there is no record of the Fiduciary Tax Estimate and the Fiduciary Tax Return, we then request the individual tax estimates and individual tax returns to determine if there is any delinquency.

If we receive no favorable response to the above requests, we will then file a currency report on the amount claimed/assessed against our account and begin the commercial process that will force them to either do what's required or lose everything they own - except for the clothing they are wearing at the time. This is the power of contracts (commerce) and it should be mentioned, at least this one time, that a contract overrides the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and any other document other than another contract. We should also mention that no process of law -"color" of law under present codes, statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances, etc. - can operate upon you, no agent and/or agency of government (including courts) can gain jurisdiction over you, WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT. You, (we) are not within their fictional commercial venue.

The Accepted for Value process, however, gives us the ability to deal with "them" -through the use of our transmitting utility/go-between, the STRAWMAN -and hold them accountable in their own commercial world, for any action(s) they attempt to take against us. Without a proper Order, and now we know they're not in possession of such a document, they must leave us alone ... or pay the consequences.

Yes, this process IS powerful.

Yes, it CAN set us free from government oppression and control.

What are the Steps for Laying the Groundwork to Discharge Debt?

1) Properly filing a UCC-1 form to establish a public record that you are not the STRAWMAN and in fact are the holder-in-due-course of it.  This is the single most important tool in your tool bag because this alone changes the presumption of law from the side of the STATE to your side;

2) Making yourself the Power of Attorney over the corporate fiction.

3) Copyrighting the STRAWMAN's name.  This doesn't just give you another defensive strategy - it gives you a very important offensive weapon, because from this point on, anyone who is coming after your STRAWMAN for anything without your permission is trespassing on your commercial property.

4) Properly filing your Public Notice and Surety Bond.

5) Properly filing these documents in your County Recorders Office.

Note: The five steps above will take about 90 days to complete because of the filing at the Secretary of Treasury in Washington D.C. and filing in your County Recorders Office.

You've possibly heard of the term "judicial immunity" a judge has, or so-called "unlimited immunity" a clerk or a policeman or an IRS agent has protected by his or her agency.  Well, it hardly exists at all.  The only immunity any agent has is when they are within their jurisdiction, and they have no jurisdiction over you the real live person.

Are you a man or woman looking for or experiencing any of the following problems or issues?

1.  Have you recently discovered that the so-called system in our country is oppressing you?

2. Do you understand that there is a problem, but you can’t quite put your finger on the actual solution?

3. Are you tired of being the victim of corruption?

4. Is there an agency taking or about to take everything you have?

5. Are you in debt to the point that you feel hopeless and without a solution?

6. Are You looking for a solution to all of these situations and more that you haven’t thought about or didn’t realize were there, and are you ready to take on full liability and responsibility for your actions?

  If anyone goes after your Strawman or property owned by your strawman you will be able to protect your interests.


Persoons fictie uitgebreid



Een rechtssubject of persoon (in juridische zin) is een drager van subjectieve rechten en plichten. Deze bezit met andere woorden rechtspersoonlijkheid of juridische persoonlijkheid.

In de meeste hedendaagse rechtsstelsels worden twee soorten rechtssubjecten erkend: natuurlijke personen (mensen) en rechtspersonen. De woorden 'rechtspersoonlijkheid' en 'rechtspersoon' moeten niet door elkaar worden gehaald: het eerste woord heeft betrekking op alle rechtssubjecten (personen), het tweede woord alleen op de rechtssubjecten die geen natuurlijke persoon zijn.

Hoewel het woord iemand in het Nederlands normaal gesproken alleen op mensen slaat, wordt het in de Nederlandse wetgeving af en toe ook in deze ruime betekenis gebruikt, dus voor alle personen met inbegrip van rechtspersonen. Voorbeelden zijn de bepaling over de woonplaats van onder bewind gestelde personen (artikel 12 lid 2 van Boek 1 BW, het deel dat verder vooral over personen- en familierecht gaat) en de bepaling over goede trouw in het vermogensrecht (artikel 11 van Boek 3 BW).

Rechtspersonen worden nader verdeeld in privaatrechtelijke rechtspersonen (bijvoorbeeld de naamloze vennootschap en de besloten vennootschap met beperkte aansprakelijkheid en de vereniging) en publiekrechtelijke rechtspersonen (bijvoorbeeld de Staat, provincies, gemeenten en waterschappen) naargelang hun doel, dat ofwel privaat of publiek is. Private rechtspersonen dienen ter behartiging van private belangen (zoals bv. winstbejag), terwijl publiekrechtelijke rechtspersonen het algemeen belang dienen.

Een gezin of familie is geen rechtssubject, maar bestaat uit twee of meer natuurlijke personen die ieder afzonderlijk rechtssubject zijn. Vormen twee echtgenoten of geregistreerde partners een vennootschap onder firma (vof), dan is deze ook een rechtssubject. Naar de huidige Nederlandse wetgeving is een vennootschap onder firma echter geen rechtspersoon. In rechtszaken wordt zij echter wel geaccepteerd als ware zij een rechtspersoon doordat de vof een afgescheiden vermogen heeft dat anders niet vatbaar zou zijn voor verhaal. De vof is dan dus de procespartij, eventueel kunnen daarnaast ook de vennoten procespartij zijn.

In de jaren 1970 vond in het Amerikaans milieurecht het principe ingang dat ecologische elementen zoals bomen of rivieren een subjectief recht konden doen gelden. Sedert begin 21e eeuw is het principe in sommige landen wet geworden.[1]  



Hoe nu om te gaan met de stroman?


Nu je dit allemaal te weten bent gekomen over de naamfraude, zul je je waarschijnlijk bedrogen voelen. Ik dring er op aan dat je hier snel overheen komt en manieren vindt om weer aan de macht te komen. Ja, het is een sluw spelletje dat ons allemaal wordt aangedaan, en ja, we hebben het over fraude.  We hebben dit nooit geleerd op school en ja, dat is opzettelijk. Nu zeggen ze wel dat je de wet moet kennen.  Dus laten we het dan als doel stellen!   Er zijn strategieën die je wat macht terug kunnen geven. is op zoek naar informatie hierover en zal deze publiceren.  Je bent zelf verantwoordelijk voor al je acties. Doe goed onderzoek voordat je een strategie uitprobeert!  Je zou jezelf in de problemen kunnen brengen door te snel te gaan.  Een goede manier om te beginnen is door te kijken naar de "solution based series" video's op Observation Deck.  

Oproep:  Het merendeel van alle informatie over onderwerpen van deze site komen van niet Nederlandse bronnen.  De uitdaging voor UnchainedSociety is niet alleen het letterlijk vertalen maar ook het vertalen naar het Nederlandse recht systeem. 


We zoeken mensen die ons hierbij kunnen helpen.  Voorbeelden:

Status standing en jurisdiction.  Veel uitleg van David Straight maar wat is de Nederlandse / Europese variant hiervan? 

"Notice of special appearance" hoe gaat dat op z'n Nederlands / Europees?

Maken van een "Court of record" op z'n Nederlands / Europees we snappen het concept maar nieuwschierig naar details?

Op correcte wijze documenten op de post doen, ect ect.


We stellen ons nederig op, want we weten simpelweg ook nog niet alles.

Weet jij hier de antwoorden op of heb je suggesties en of toevoegingen gebruik de contact tab op de site.